Franklin
Graham is coming to New Hampshire this month as part of an evangelistic sweep
through New England called “Decision America – Northeast Tour” sponsored by the
Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. I will not be attending.
There was a time when I adored Billy Graham. I still hold
his memory in high esteem. His son – not so much. Franklin is too political and
his rhetoric too intolerant for me to tolerate any longer. It shows how much
evangelicalism has changed, and how much I have changed.
I used to attend Billy Graham “crusades,” back when we never
gave a thought to how offensive the term was to Muslims. While in seminary I
was a counselor at his 1977 crusade in Cincinnati and at Billy Graham films. My
father-in-law (also a Baptist pastor) thought of him so highly that I sometimes
suspected that he considered Billy as the third person of the Trinity.
Those were the good old days when “evangelical” referred solely
to one’s religious persuasion. Now it has become synonymous with the Religious Right.
Back in those halcyon days Jimmy Carter was the public face of what it meant to
be evangelical – before Ronald Reagan captured the hearts of the Moral
Majority.
Now the word evangelical means that you support Donald Trump
and a conservative social agenda. (Eighty-one percent of evangelicals voted for
the president in the 2016 election.) It means that you are opposed to abortion,
homosexuality, Islam, immigrants and a host of other “sins” and “sinners.” Furthermore
it means that one wants to enforce that agenda through legislation.
Evangelicalism used to be – at least in my mind – a
biblically-based expression of the unconditional love of God to all people. Now
it feels very unloving. At least that is the way I hear it, as voiced in the
rhetoric of Franklin Graham and others of his ilk. It also seems to be increasingly
intolerant of progressive Christians and people of other faiths.
From my perspective evangelicalism has abandoned the gospel in
exchange for political power. I am sure they see it otherwise, and might say
that I am no longer Christian. The whole situation saddens me. I am glad that
my father-in-law is not alive to see what has become of the organization that
bears his hero’s name.
I am in the process of reading my 2013 book “Experiencing
God Directly” on my podcast. As I recorded the introduction to the book
recently, I found myself reading aloud these words: “I am a Baptist. In fact I
would acknowledge the term evangelical to describe my religious persuasion,
although I seldom use this term because of its connotations in popular American
culture.”
That is no longer true. I no longer identify with the term,
and I haven’t for several years. Not because I have changed so much in the last
six years. It is because evangelicalism has changed so much. I guess I have become
an ex-evangelical or “exvangelical” – a word recently coined to refer to those
who have left the evangelical fold.
Some exvangelicals have abandoned religion completely. I
remain stubbornly Christian and incurably religious, while becoming more
progressive theologically, socially, and ethically. I have left evangelicalism
in order to remain authentically Christian. I choose to remain a follower of
Jesus and his radical gospel of love and grace, rather than walk the meandering
paths of evangelicalism. So long, Franklin Graham.
3 comments:
Marshall, my journey has been similar although I never identified with evangelicals per se. I grew up with listening to Billy Graham and had great respect for him In adolescence I began to question his descriptions of a God that kept a ledger of sins to hold us accountable. I have read his biography and still respect the man and know from what I've read that he had the wisdom and discernment to grow in his understanding. Franklin, on the other hand reminds me of the reformed smoker who becomes so zealously anti-smoking or the sober alcoholic who is now so zealously anti-drinking. Franklin does not seem to understand the unconditional love of God for all his creations regardless of faith tradition. God looks at the heart, knows our intentions,and is merciful to all. I identify with Christ and he is my example but I know that there have been so many Christ-like examples, living and dead who I cannot believe should be condemned just because they do not profess Christ. ArchBishop Tutu has said he could not believe in a God that would condemn the Dalhi Lama, both men are worthy examples. I do not believe Franklin is. Rev Ann Cady
Marshall, you say you think that the religious right & Franklin Graham are too intolerant. Than you go on to write that 82% of evangelicals voted for Pres. Trump. How could a Christian vote for a party that is Pro-Abortion. Wouldn't Jesus be against such a party. Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate as well as Donald Trump & I couldn't vote for either one, I voted 3rd Party. You said that President Trump is anti-homosexual yet his agenda has been the most pro LBGT agenda as a President in history. You also say that they are anti-immigrant which is not the case. They are against illegal immigration & would like our laws to not be violated. The Democratic party has become intolerant of Christians as well as the Jewish faith. As the party has continued to move to the left it makes the right seem more extreme, when they haven't moved at all. It sounds like maybe you are getting too political in your stances & not the evangelicals. Bill Nelson
Thanks for your comment, Bill. Let me clarify my thoughts on the issues you raised.
Yes, I think a Christian can vote for a party that is pro-choice, for the simple reason that scripture does not address the issue of abortion directly and Christians can honestly disagree on the issue. One’s stance on abortion is not a litmus test for whether or not one is a Christian.
Actually I did not say that the president is anti-homosexual. I said that evangelicals are against homosexuality. But I do think that Trump’s action banning transgender persons from serving in the military, and his statement in support of the baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, make it clear he is not supportive of gay rights. I don’t see how anyone can characterize him as the most pro-LGBT agenda President in history.
As far as immigrants are concerned, both parties are against illegal immigration. Where they differ is how to treat those immigrants. This administration has not treated immigrants – legal or illegal – well, as evidenced in the death of immigrant children while in custody and the separation of families.
I do not see any evidence that the Democratic party is intolerant of Christians and the Jewish faith. The fact that three-quarters of American Jews identity as liberal and support Democratic candidates seem to indicate otherwise.
As far as my politics is concerned I am not affiliated with either party, regularly vote for candidates of both parties, and have often voted third party.
Lastly I will say a word about Hillary Clinton. For all her faults, she is a devout Christian and a lifelong United Methodist. If their Christian faith was a determining factor in their voting, evangelicals would have voted for her. But instead of voting for a fellow Christian, they chose a man of questionable moral character with no religious faith in order to advance their social agenda. That hypocrisy is one of many reasons why I can no longer identify as evangelical.
Post a Comment