That is a story you likely won’t hear this Easter Sunday! Instead Christians
will hear the familiar favorites. They will hear the tale of Mary Magdalene at
the garden tomb, the two disciples on the Emmaus Road, and the eleven disciples
in the upper room. They will hear about women coming to an empty tomb, the stone being rolled away, and angels descending and declaring that Jesus had risen
from the dead.
Other stories, like the one quoted above, church-goers will
not hear. They also will not hear the story of when the risen Lord appeared to
his brother James. They will not hear the account of when the resurrected
Christ appeared to 500 disciples at the same time. These are listed by the
Apostle Paul in his first letter to the Corinthians, but they are missing from the
gospels.
Those events are mentioned only in passing by Paul, and their
full stories are never told. Why? A resurrection appearance to 500 people at
once seems important enough be included in a gospel, but no gospel writer
mentions it. An appearance to a member of Jesus’ family who would become the
head of the Jerusalem church also seems worthy of a few verses, but the gospel
writers are silent about it.
Isn’t it important to know that other people besides Jesus rose from the dead on Easter Sunday? What were their names? What happened to them? What stories did they tell of their death and resurrections? Their first-hand accounts would put modern Near Death Experiences to shame!
Furthermore why don’t other
ancient historical documents record such a dramatic event? The resurrection of “many”
people (dozens? hundreds?) in Jerusalem would seem to merit at least a footnote
by Josephus.
Why aren’t these other resurrection stories told? One
possible answer is that the gospel writers did not know about these other
resurrection stories. If they knew about them, then they made an editorial
decision to exclude them. They either omitted them because they did not believe
the stories to be true, or they omitted them for theological and ecclesiastical
reasons. I go with this latter reason.
These stories are not told by the gospel writers for the
same reason they are not told from pulpits today. Something about those stories
did not fit conventional Christian theology. The mere existence of untold Easter
stories means that the compilation of the New Testament is more complex than most
Christians know. It makes you wonder what else was intentionally omitted.
What other gospels were refused entrance into the New
Testament and why? These censored gospels and letters reveal that early Christianity
was much more diverse than the proto-orthodox version that made it past the
canonical watchdogs. These missing Easter stories seem to indicate that Resurrection Sunday
was much richer than the canonical gospels suggest!
The best part of this fuller vision of Easter is that it includes us. Like the apostle Paul, we have our own Easter stories to tell. Easter is not just for the original apostles of long ago.
That is why I have always liked the original ending of Mark’s gospel, which is the earliest of the four canonical gospels. It contains no resurrection appearances. It is open-ended. It concludes with the message of an angel saying that if we go forth, “you will see him, as he told you.”
Like the apostle Paul, we may have been “untimely born,” but we are not too late. The Easter story is our story. It is now. Christ is risen! He is risen indeed!
Alleluia!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Marshall for sharing the more obscure Easter stories. It’s a beautiful message to us all as well as a cautionary tale to read more deeply and widely. Happy Easter!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Marshall for sharing the obscure Easter story. It brings new light to the meaning of Easter. And it is also a cautionary tale to read widely and deeply. Happy Easter!
ReplyDelete-Bonnie Toomey