We are studying the Old Testament book of Ruth. Ruth is a
favorite of many Christians. It ordinarily presented as a love story about a
righteous man who meets a virtuous woman and live happily ever after. While focusing
on the romance, the radical nature of the book is often overlooked.
It is one of only two books in the Old Testament that has a woman
as the main character. The other book is Esther, which was likely written at
about the same time. The Book of Ruth is written from a woman’s perspective. The
husbands of Naomi, Ruth and Orpah, are killed off in the opening verses before
we get to know anything about them. The other men – except for Boaz – are minor
characters in the story.
Because it is written from a woman’s perspective, it is
thought by some biblical scholars that the Book of Ruth may have been written
by a woman. That would make it unique in the Bible. Of course we don’t know the
book’s authorship for sure. The book is anonymous, which is what we would
expect if it had been authored by a woman. If it was known to be written by a
woman, it never would have made it into the canon.
Not only is the central character a woman, she is a Moabite.
Moabites were the historic enemies of the Hebrews. This Moabite marries Boaz,
who is the son of Rahab, a Canaanite prostitute from Jericho, a “sinner” in the
eyes of religious society. Yet the
genealogy at the end of the book informs us that Ruth and Boaz were the
great-grandparents of David, the greatest Jewish king.
That genealogy in the final sentence of the book is the
reason Ruth was written. It reveals that foreigners were an integral part of
the history of Israel. In doing so, it challenged the teaching of the Torah,
which said that no descendant of a Moabite could enter the temple. Yet David had
such ancestors, and his son Solomon built the temple.
The book of Ruth is “protest literature.” It was written at
a time when anti-women and anti-foreigner moralists had taken over the
government in Jerusalem. It is probable that the Book of Ruth was written in the
fifth century BC, when Ezra was purging Israel of all foreigners – Moabites in
particular. Ezra required all Jewish men
who had married foreign women to divorce them publicly and send them and their
children away.
Nehemiah followed up on Ezra’s reforms with a building program
to construct a wall to keep foreigners out of Jerusalem. It does not take much
thinking to see parallels to policies popular in American society today. The
Book of Ruth was written to challenge the narrative that religious fundamentalists
were preaching. It was pointing out that if one looks into the history of
Israel one can see that diversity did not threaten Israel but rather strengthened
it.
I call the Book of Ruth radical. The etymology of the word
“radical” means “root.” We get the English word “radish” from it. The root of
true Biblical spirituality is not about building walls to keep people out but
drawing the circle wider. It is not about priding ourselves on being God’s chosen
people and excluding others. It is about seeing that God’s people have always
included all types of people.
That is the root of the gospel of Jesus, who reached out to
foreigners and sinners. Jesus declared that a Roman soldier had more faith than
anyone in Israel. He said that “sinners” were entering the Kingdom of God ahead
of the Sadducees and Pharisees, who were the heirs of Ezra. This is the Gospel
of Ruth. It is as controversial today as it was when the Book of Ruth was
written.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome comments, as long as they are signed. I review all comments before they appear online. Anonymous or inappropriate material will not be posted. Thanks for the feedback!